Monday, May 30, 2011
Film Review: Tucker & Dale Vs. Evil
It's probably one of the biggest cliches in horror movies. Sexy students go in to the woods and get picked off, one by one, by inbred hillbillies. The sheer volume of films with the exact same plot must be in the hundreds. And it's a situation ripe for parody.
How no one thought of doing a film like Tucker & Dale Vs. Evil before is beyond me. Turning the generic horror movie plot on it's head, it tells of two likable hillbillies, travelling to their new vacation home in the forest. But soon after arriving, they run into a group of college students who instantly assume they are inbred sociopathic maniacs intent on killing them.
Things get worse when Tucker (Alan Tudyk) and Dale (Tyler Labine) save the life of one of the students, Allison (30 Rock's Katrina Bowden), but all her friends assume they abducting her, and they start to plot revenge against them, which results in a lot of misunderstandings and accidental deaths.
In a time where most horror films (and most films generally) are remakes or sequels or re-imaginings, to have a film so original, yet so simple is a joy. The writing is top notch, kind of comparable in a way to Hatchet, another horror movie where the writing is so well done you really don't want to the characters to get knocked off, whereas a lot of horror movies, you just can't wait!
The friendship between Tucker and Dale is really nicely done as well, with a legitimately touching scene between the two near the end (does end with a punchline, though), and it's just hilarious throughout, whether it be the dialogue or the OTT pratfalls and accidents that befall the students.
But gorehounds shouldn't be too optimistic, there are some horrific looking moments, particularly an incident with a wood chipper, but the film doesn't rely on these too strongly, rather the characters - the sheer stupidity of the students (I guess these have to be the dumbest students in horror film history, quite the feat) and the mix of innocence and exasperation of Dale and Tucker, respectively. Although, I did find the main student, Chad (Jesse Moss) a bit much, with a back story pointlessly shoehorned in rather than just have him lead the group.
It's a very strong debut from director Eli Craig, and the fact that he made what essentially is a one joke movie last the duration, keeping the viewer interested throughout is a great achievement. Hell, I wouldn't mind a sequel!
****
An original and hilarious comedy horror that turns the tables on the normal 'hillbillies in the woods' plot. Top stuff.
Sunday, May 29, 2011
The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo US Remake Trailer!
Check it out!
Friday, May 27, 2011
Film Review: [REC] 2
The first [REC] film was absolutely brilliant. Horrific, tense and with a killer ending, it was a true original (and obviously got remade into a shot for shot American remake Quarantine, which made the fatal mistake of casting known actors, and being utterly pointless, of course).
So it was with some trepidation I watched the sequel (quite late, I know) - how many sequels to horror films even start to capture what made the original good, let alone ones that are set immediately after the first, continuing the story out for another film?
Well [REC] 2 is the exception to that rule. It hits the ground running and does not let up at all during its super trim 85 minute running time.
We join the action with another SWAT team entering the quarantined apartment building featured in the original, to find what has been left, being joined by a doctor (who soon reveals himself to be a priest as well). The terror is still ongoing, and the doctor needs a blood sample to try and develop and antidote, but there's a lot more to the zombie-like creatures than anyone knows.
Also in the complex are a fireman, some teenagers, who climbed in from the sewers and the father of the infected girl Jennifer, from the original film. Now, in most films where they have some 'crazy' teenagers introduced to the plot for a second film, that's normally enough to have me reaching for the remote, but somehow Juame Balguero and Paco Plaza (Writers and directors, both returning from the first film) manage to make that work too. It's actually amazing how they manage it.
Much like the first, the tension is there throughout, and there is some terrific jump out of your skin moments, and a interesting twist at the end. Although that twist is kind of a double edged sword, it's all very well done but it leaves the door wide open for a third film (which, in fact there will be in 2012, but with a prequel being released this year) and there's no way they can make it work again is there? I'd rather it have been a closed ending, making it one of the greatest double bills of horror films in years.
****
Excellent, scary, tense stuff, one of the best horror sequels I've seen in a long time. But...setting up a third film is madness. I hope I eat my words, but I'd rather have just ended things here.
Film Review: Burke And Hare
Another film that wasn't exactly enticing me to watch it (but thanks to me exploiting a LoveFilm trial, I'm catching some of these films now) was Burke And Hare. I'm not going to lie to you, the only reason I wanted to see it was because it was the return of the legendary John Landis (Animal House, American Werewolf In London, Trading Places, The Blues Brothers to name just some of his work) to the directors chair for the first time since the disastrous Blues Brothers 2000 (which, bizarrely came out in 1998.)
Burke and Hare is based loosely on the true story of Irish immigrants turned body snatchers William's Burke (Simon Pegg) and Hare (Andy Serkis) who supplied dead bodies to a medical school in Edinburgh run by Dr. Robert Knox (Tom Wilkinson) for money.
It doesn't really sound like a comedy but that's how it seems how writers Piers Ashworth and Nick Moorcroft (best known for the recent St. Trinians remakes) wanted it portrayed. Sadly the film is so badly written it doesn't know what it wants to be. A comedy? A horror? It fails on every level.
I'm not saying you can't make a dark comedy about the subject matter, but this is just woeful. It's just all so lazy, 90% of the jokes miss their target, and you know things are bad when you have those dreadful 'This is how [insert invention here] got it's name!' (this time being funeral parlours and photographs). Even if this were true, I wouldn't want the cringe inducing 'nudge nudge, wink wink' joke in a film. It's not smart, and it's not clever.
Thank god then for the direction of John Landis, the film looks great thanks to him, but he is not given much to work with. It's very well shot throughout. Although, there's not a 'See You Next Wednesday' in sight which was a shame. Hopefully Landis will be a bit more prolific after this.
Also the cast save this from being a one star affair. Whilst not being the best actors around, Simon Pegg and Andy Serkis have enough charisma and likability to keep the viewer watching and there is a great English cast who all do good jobs, as well as Tom Wilkinson, Tim Curry, Ronnie Corbett, Bill Bailey (who we should have seen more of somehow), Jessica Hynes, Christopher Lee, Reece Shearsmith all feature, as well as Isla Fisher who is routinely entertaining in every film I have seen her in.
Sadly though, it's just not enough. It's a shame because everything else about the film is good except, arguably, the most important element. The writing. And without that, you have a film that needs to be buried, and left that way.
*1/2
Extra marks given to the good direction, and the charismatic cast, but the script is an utter mess, and not even they can save it. A shambles and a shame.
Thursday, May 26, 2011
Film Review: Runaway
Runaway is one of those films I'm surprised I haven't seen before. It's got Tom Selleck, Gene Simmons and is written and directed by Michael Crichton, the man who brought us Jurassic Park, Twister, Westworld and E.R. It must have just got past me this whole time. Not being available in the U.K. didn't help (it is available on American DVD however, although the sound is pretty bad.)
Selleck stars as Ramsay, a police officer who works for a unit that deals with malfunctioning, or 'runaway' robots. You see, while the film seems to be taking place in it's present day (the mid 80s) robots now do everything. From look after the kids to construction work to mowing the lawn. This is what bothered me a bit about the film from the outset - such amazing advances are made in the world of robotics, but everything else is exactly the same. Phones, clothing, cars! It did bug me most of the film.
Anyway, Ramsay and new partner Thompson (Cynthia Rhodes) investigate the the killing of a family at the hands of their own robots and have discovered someone as overridden them with orders to kill. This leads them to Dr. Charles Luther (Gene Simmons) who is developing robots that kill to sell on the black market. Ramsay and Thompson must track him down, using one of Luther's employees (an early film role for Kirsty Alley) to assist.
After you get past the ludicrous 'futuristic, but not that futuristic' thing, Runaway is quite a decent film. There's some great action sequences, a freeway chase, and the climatic skyscraper encounter are both quite gripping. The spider robots that Luther creates are pretty creepy also, spitting acid and exploding shortly after so that no evidence is left.
And what of KISS legend Gene Simmons, in what was his first film? Well it's not the most brilliantly acted performance I've ever seen, but he doesn't half look menacing throughout. That was the reason he was cast, director Crichton asked Simmons to stare at him for a minute without making any facial expressions!
Obviously, Michael Crichton went on to bigger and better things with the success of Jurassic Park and E.R., but this could have been another hit to go under his belt. What stopped him? Another film about robots in a present day surrounding (well, cyborgs if you are going to split hairs) in The Terminator. Who knows what would have happened to Runaway.
***
Get past the ropey bits of the plot, and you'll find an interesting movie, with some thrilling moments. If you're a fan of Crichton, Selleck or Simmons, check it out!
Wednesday, May 25, 2011
The Greatest Films You've Never Seen 2
Hot Rod
The Lonely Island did a film. See it!
House Of The Devil
Retro feeling horror about a babysitter in danger. Contains a creepy performance from Tom Noonan.
Hunt To Kill
Decent little action film starring Steve Austin. Nothing original but contains a great fight scene with Gary Daniels, and a small role from Eric Roberts.
Martin
George A. Romero does teenage vampire angst before Twilight was even thought of, and obviously it's way better. One of Romero's favourite films of his.
Martyrs
Shocking French psychological horror, but that doesn't even scratch the surface. Review here.
Mega Shark Vs. Giant Octopus
Purposely stupid creature vs creature 'horror'. Hilariously bad. Features Debbie Gibson as a scientist.
Never Sleep Again: The Elm Street Legacy
Amazing, in depth documentary about the making of all the Elm Street movies. Runs for 4 hours, and it's nowhere near long enough. Only available on import DVD, hunt it out.
The Room
The worst film ever made? Maybe. But also one of the most entertaining. Review here.
Pump Up The Volume
Christian Slater is mysterious, rabble rousing late night cult DJ and shy teenager whilst at school. After one of his listeners kills themselves, the authorities are called in to shut the show down.
Showdown In Little Tokyo
Dolph Lundgren and Brandon Lee are detectives who team up to fight the Yakuza. All action, and great fun.
Toy Soldiers
Terrorists take over a boarding school and Sean Astin, Will Wheaton and Lou Gossett Jr. must stop them. Sounds crap, but it's a great little film. Andrew Divoff is the terrorists leader and is fantastic.
Universal Soldier: Regeneration
Even I thought this was going to be bad, but Jean Claude Van Damme and Dolph Lundgren return and confound expectation. This should have been on at the cinema, not go straight to DVD.
Vamp
An 80s high school comedy...but with vampires. Grace Jones stars as the head vampire in this cult classic.
Film Review: Suspiria
Dario Argento is a hard director to get into for me. There's a lot of good about his films, classic scenes that will forever be synonymous with the horror genre. But in the middle of all that, in my eyes, is some pretty ropey stuff. Suspiria is no exception to the rule.
Suzy Bannion (Jessica Harper) travels from America to join a European ballet school, but as soon as she arrives, things are not as they seem. Another student flees the school the moment Suzy turns up, and all sorts of strange events are occurring, and Suzy takes it upon herself to get to the bottom of them.
Suspiria has some great moments going for it. The scene pictured above is from an amazing set piece at the start of the film, brilliantly shot and highly effective. And quite a lot of the film is. But, on the other hand, a lot is absolutely dreadful. It's that 70s European horror vibe to it all, and that is something I've never managed to get on with. And (not the films fault) they are just horrifically dated.
That's not saying that the set pieces are the only good thing about the film at all. The score, that Argento did with Goblin is bizarre and terrifying in places, really unnerving stuff and fits the film perfectly. And it is shot beautifully, the use of colours (red, especially) is just fantastic.
But I just can't call it a horror classic, a cult classic for sure. But when you have poor dialogue and bad acting in an otherwise great film, you can't just ignore it. The ending also lets the side down, it just seems so abrupt and as if Argento had run out of ideas.
But people out there call it the scariest film of all time. And sure it's a film with some great moments. But it's also a film with the worst looking dog prop in cinema history, and a scene where a girl is caught up in a giant slinky.
***
Some outstanding moments, dragged down by bad acting, bad script and some utter nonsense. There's a lot to enjoy in Suspiria if you can get through the latter. Ideal for some, not so much for others
Film Review: Cop Out
I had been warned repeatedly not to bother with Cop Out. But I just had to see it. I literally had not heard a kind word said about since it came out and I just had to see if it was really THAT bad. It was.
The fact that it is directed by Kevin Smith is an absolute shock. If had no knowledge of who directed this before I watched it, it could have been anyone helming. It lacks any kind of visual flair or any kind of directorial calling cards(although Jason Lee does have a small role), and really brings into question if Smith ever had any (and the mixed reviews for his next film Red State, seem to be backing this up.) His View Askew films ranged from good to amazing, but was it just keeping it all within the Askewniverse? Look at the one time Smith stepped out to direct Jersey Girl, another unimpressive effort. And although Zack and Miri Make A Porno was OK, but wasn't even a patch on Mallrats!
He now seems satisfied to push his 'Smodcasts' and just tweet the day away on Twitter, and that's fine because he is a funny guy, but it's looking anything not Jay and Silent Bob related is proving quite the struggle.
Rumours on set of Cop Out suggested a huge set of differences between Smith and star Bruce Willis. Getting along fine after the formers cameo in Die Hard 4, Willis wanted to work with Smith again, but apparently regretted it. Smith's marijuana use has become quite the characteristic of his latter work, and it really shows. He may feel he works better under the influence, but this isn't working from home, it's directing a big budget movie.
Anyway the film stars Willis as Jimmy Monroe, a police officer recently suspended, along with his partner Paul Hodges (Tracy Morgan.) As he needs money now to pay for his daughters wedding, he decides to sell a rare baseball card he has, but it gets stolen, and Monroe and Hodges go after it. Seriously, that's what this film is about. I know I don't normally do spoilers, but this film is terrible and you shouldn't watch it, but the baseball card thing to pay for the wedding doesn't even happen, rendering the entire 100 minutes before it even more pointless.
All the blame doesn't lie at the door of Smith. The script is appalling, and I cannot believe that it was one of Hollywood's top unfilmed scripts for so long. Really badly thought out scenarios. Hodges and Monroe are supposed to have been partners for 9 years, kind of indicating that they have been cops for at least that. But Hodges acts like he was given a badge and a gun the day before (A scene near the end shows Hodges expressing total surprise he got shot at) and the relationship between the two partners seems like they've known each other for 2 months tops.
Tracy Morgans performance. Well, I just tried to look at that like he was playing Tracy Jordan, his character from 30 Rock in one of his hilarious looking fake films. I'm sure Fat Bitch or Who Dat Ninja would have been an improvement on this. Willis, just looks bored throughout.
But I can't help but just come back to Smith again. I can understand sort of where he was coming from. A homage to the 80s buddy cop movies (Hell, even Harold Faltermeyer was convinced to come out of retirement to do the score), but did he not even glance at the script? Was the appeal of working with Willis that great, that he'd direct any old piece of crap? It's a crying shame if this is what some people remember Kevin Smith by.
*
It may earn me a 'ka-block' on Twitter, but so be it. This is a lazy, humourless, piece of garbage which seems like it was directed by someone who just suffered a severe head injury, and written by a couple of ten year olds that think cock jokes are the height of comed. Avoid like the plague.
Tuesday, May 24, 2011
Film Review: The Book Of Eli
The Book Of Eli is The Hughes Brothers (Menace II Society, Dead Presidents) first film since 2001's From Hell and stars Denzel Washington, Gary Oldman and Mila Kunis.
Wsahington plays a man only passingly referred to as Eli, a man walking a post apocalyptic country after an unnamed catastrophic event - its referred to as a flash in parts but like the recently released The Road we never really find out what happened. For the best really when these type of events are explained they are usually picked to pieces.
Eli carries a book with him which he has taken on himself to protect and will go to any lengths to, and trouble really starts when he arrives in a settlement of non-cannibal survivors seemingly run by Carnegie (Oldman).
Carnegie is desperately searching for a book and is sending teams out to look for it and is assisted by his right hand man Redridge (Ray Stevenson from TV's Rome).
When Carnegie discovers that Eli has the book he tries whatever it takes to get it as his gang leave the settlement to follow Eli and Solara (Kunis), a young girl who wants to tag along.
The film is definitely worth a watch and does offer a great turn from Gary Oldman - but he always does villains well he is one of the best in the field, and theres a few nice little cameo's which I won't spoil here.
It's also nicely shot, not as good as The Road (which was a far superior 'post apocalyptic man on a mission' film I had watched a few days before)
But it is quite predictable. I got the end of the films big twist quite soon into the film, not long after Washington's character arrives at the settlement, and its also slightly overlong and could have done with a ten or fifteen minute trim.
***
Nice to see The Hughes' back and always good to see Gary Oldman scenery chomping but predictable and slightly bloated.
Film Review: All The King's Men
All The King's Men is the 2006 adaptation of Robert Penn Warren novel of the same name and is directed (and also written for the screen) by Steven Zaillian who wrote Hannibal, Gangs Of New York and American Gangster amongst others.
Sean Penn leads an all star cast featuring Jude Law, Kate Winslet, Anthony Hopkins, James Gandolfini, Mark Ruffalo, Jackie Earl Halley and Patricia Clarkson.
Penn plays Willie Stark who is elected Louisiana governor by a landslide of lower class voters. Soon thereafter Stark is threatened by impeachment by Judge Irwin (Hopkins) and a group ofg politicians who want him out, so it is up to Jack Burden (Law) to dig up some dirt on Irwin, but this ends with tragic consequences.
All The King's Men is very well acted - look at the cast - how could it not be? And it is also intelligently written but the main problem is that it has been done before - not referring to the book and other adaptation of it on stage or screen, but plot wise its very samey with it's government corruption story.
The other problem is that it's quite, quite dull. The story drags along with really not much happening. Not even the starry cast can save it from how mundane and really melodramatic in places it is
**
A great performance from Penn et al cannot save this from never getting out of the stalls.
Film Review: Heathers
When Heathers came out back in 1988, no one had seen anything like it. And it is pretty safe to say no one has since.
Seen as an antidote to the somewhat saccharine nature of 1980's John Hughes teen films like Sixteen Candles, Pretty In Pink and Some Kind Of Wonderful (films I adore by the way) Heathers brought the teen angst to a whole new level no one dared to.
Directed by Michael Lehmann (who sadly followed this up with Hudson Hawk and Airheads amongst others before redeeming himself directing episodes of The West Wing, Californication and True Blood) Heathers starred Winona Ryder who at that point was best known for her role in Beetlejuice and Christian Slater.
Ryder plays Veronica who is desperate to get in to her high schools clique 'The Heathers' (Shannen Doherty, Lisanne Falk and Kim Walker) when she suddenly meets mysterious new student JD (Slater) and when they get together the bodies start to drop...
One of the great things about this film is knowing that there is no way it would ever get remade. In these times when 6 months doesn't pass when you don't hear about another Columbine or Virginia Tech a film that portrays high school shootings (and not to mention teen suicide) would be positively radioactive.
Heathers wasn't heavy handed in it's writing either, but brilliantly dissecting what students reaction would be if this happened, and at the same time spawning a whole new language for teenagers to spout a decade before anyone had even said the name 'Juno'. "What's your damage?" "I gotta book" and "Get crucial" all memorable lines still.
Obviously with its subject matter the comedy is dark, dark, dark. The second funeral is one of the funniest scenes in the movie ("I love my dead gay son!") and the scenes in the teachers lounge are terrific - ambivalence to OTT media whoring in one room.
The film also contains Christian Slater's best performance (next to True Romance of course) and a great turn from Winona Ryder, who sadly seems to be in less and less these days. Or maybe I'm just not seeing what she is in.
Heathers was a one of a kind, and even though it gets a little silly in places I wouldn't change it.
****The original anti-teen movie. Not seen it? You best book!
Film Review: Street Fighter
In my previous review of Double Impact I mentioned about bad films falling on the correct side of "So bad it's good". Double Impact does. Street Fighter, however, does not. Nowhere close.
Released in 1994 after the success of the video game Street Fighter 2 (which I fondly remember playing on the SNES), Street Fighter was written and directed by Steven E. de Souza who had previously written Commando and Die Hard. Sadly he also wrote Hudson Hawk and The Flintsone's Movie.
The casting was catastrophic. The choice to play All-American hard man Guille? The very Belgian Jean-Claude Van Damme who actually dyed his hair ginger for the role.
The choice to portray British intelligence agent Cammy? Kylie Minogue. Obviously. Where else do you go for a British actress - an Australian singer of course!
The villain in the piece is M. Bison and Raul Julia who was most famously known for playing Gomez in The Addams Family movie. Sadly not long after Street Fighter was made, Raul Julia died. And to be brutally honest it was probably of shame.
The movie is a disaster on all fronts. I know it must be difficult to make a movie out of a video game which basically is just a series of fights, but this is a horrific attempt. The plot is that M. Bison has kidnapped some people, and Guille and company, along with a few other hangers on who are shoehorned into the film have to go save them.
The start of the film feels like you have missed the first ten minutes. It's just an absolute mess. There's some totally piss poor attempts at humor which fall flat and just lots of pointless running around.
I don't even think children would like it! It's just too stupid. Maybe the severely retarded would get something out of it.
As a post-script they actually made a video game adaptation out of this film. Thats right. The video game based on the film based on the...erm...video game.
*
You know it's bad when you use the statement "It's so bad not even Van Damme can save it".
Film Review: Double Impact
A thing you have to understand before I do any more reviews on here is that I love the cheese. Any genre if it's OTT and badly acted and falls on the correct side of bad, I get a real kick out of it.
With that in mind here's Double Impact the 1991 actioner starring Jean-Claude Van Damme and ho ho wait for it...Jean-Claude Van Damme! Yep - twice! "Double the Van Dammage" as the box states (no really it does).
Directed by Sheldon Lettich who directed other JCVD 'classics' The Hard Corps, The Order and AWOL (or Lionheart for every non British reader) Double Impact is about 2 twins (Van Damme obviously) separated at birth after their parents were murdered.
The guy who who looks out for one of the twins - Chad (who comes across very, very gay not sure if this was intended or not) decides its time to reunite the twins and sends Chad over to Hong Kong to meet Alex, ad they go and avenge their parents.
Double Impact wastes no time in bringing out the JCVD specialty that is the splits. Just seconds after you first meet Chad he is doing it (as pictured above, sadly in Lycra) and doesn't waste any time in moving the action to Hong Kong.
After that it's exactly what you'd expect - bad acting and dialogue and lots of fighting. But the real enjoyment is from the fact that the acting is so bad it's good. The female lead has no acting talent whatsoever and sounds like she has just emerged from a coma.
Theres no point even slating it really, I watched it hoping it would be bad and I wasn't disappointed!
***
A 2 star film + 4 star enjoyment. But not doubled though, enough of that in the film.
Film Review: Ghoulies/Ghoulies II
In the 1980's there was an influx of 'little monster' films. They varied from the good (Gremlins) to...well the rest (Critters, Troll). There was also Ghoulies.
The first Ghoulies film was released in 1985 and starred former rock singer (and the guy who married Jimmy Page's ex, and was also replaced Robert Palmer in Power Station) Michael Des Barres and in a very small role Jack Nance (of David Lynch film fame).
The plot involves a young couple who move into a big old house and the guy in the couple becomes possessed by a need to control ancient demons (the Ghoulies), this all goes south when he manages to conjure the corpse of the man who also became possessed years ago (Des Barres).
These sort of films you really don't need much plot, and there really isn't here. And it comes with all the things you would expect - bad script, worse acting but Ghoulies problem is that for what it is it plays it all a bit straight and it's really a bit of a drag to watch in places. A serious lack of fun at times.
This is not the case for Ghoulies II. Released 2 years later, Ghoulies II stars Phil Fondacaro (one of cinema's go to little people) and Royal Dano. It was filmed for the cheap in Italy which seemed to be the way to go at that time (Troll 2 also was if I recall correctly)
There is barely any plot this time. The Ghoulies stow away on a lorry heading towards a funfair and cause hell in the spookhouse, then the entire fair. That is essentially it.
The film is a blast and gives the audience exactly what they want - Ghoulies killing people! And at one point high fiving which is certainly worth a rewind.
Ghoulies II also benefits from an original song from W.A.S.P. on the soundtrack, the fun albeit totally generic cock rock song 'Scream Until You Like It', the video of which you can see below.
Ghoulies **
Ghoulies II ***
After the less than fun original, the franchise aims for fun and delivers. Next up? They go to college!
Film Review: The Kentucky Fried Movie
The Kentucky Fried Movie, released in 1977 directed by John Landis and written by Zucker Abrahams and Zucker was a precursor to the latter's spoof hits Airplane and The Naked Gun and is more a collection of sketches than a real movie.
Sadly for me, most the sketches were misses including the movies "legendary" centerpiece 'A Fistful Of Yen' which takes up over half an hour of the films 83 minute running time.
I just found a lot of the jokes falling flat - a newsreader watching a couple having sex isn't particularly laugh out loud amusing and stretched over 4 minutes it gets pretty dull.
And the 'hilarity' of a bloke in a gorilla suit (actually played by Rick Baker fact fans) must be lost on me somewhere.
That isn't to say it's all bad, some of the sketches are hilarious. 'Zinc Oxide and You' is a hoot, and the fake trailer for 'That's Armageddon' (starring George Lazenby and Donald Sutherland as 'The Clumsy Waiter' is a bang on parody of 70's disaster movies.
Funniest segment has to be the darkest also - the 'United Appeal For The Dead' where a family tell of their joy to still have their son in their life even though it's just his corpse. Cue a horrific montage of family activities with a dead child.
I guess in it's time it must have been quite revolutionary but these days it mostly just seems forced in its wackiness.
Both Landis (who managed to get his See You Next Wednesday calling card into the film very easily this time) and ZAZ would both go on to bigger and better things.
**
A very hit and miss affair, leaning heavy on the latter, but shows signs of genius to come.
Film Review: Kiss Kiss Bang Bang
Shane Black is a writing genius. Have written the first Lethal Weapon (as well as the story for the first sequel) he also wrote The Last Boyscout and The Long Kiss Goodnight.
Kiss Kiss Bang Bang was his first screenplay since the latter, and the first film he had ever directed, and it is a fantastic debut.
Robert Downey Jr. (in the role that really restarted his career) plays Harry Lockhart a thief who accidentally becomes an actor after running into an audition while evading the police after a bungled robbery.
Harry gets invited to all the Hollywood parties and is in strong consideration of the role of a private eye so he is teamed with real PI 'Gay' Perry (Val Kilmer) to 'research' and as you may expect all Hell breaks loose with dead bodies everywhere, and an aspiring actress from Harry's past (Michelle Monaghan)
Downey Jr. is superb here both as Harry, and as Harry the narrator, stopping the film when he messes up, winding it back, the narration is totally original and hilarious.
Val Kilmer plays the straight man to a tee, and it's hard to imagine anyone else playing him (yeah even original choice Harrison Ford)
But the main draw of the film is the writing that is just electrifying, the dialouge here is some of the best I have had the pleasure of listening to this side of Aaron Sorkin (Example dialogue "You don't get it, do you? This isn't "good cop, bad cop." This is fag and New Yorker. You're in a lot of trouble.")
It's a damn shame no one really knows who Shane Black (know his films obviously) and an even bigger shame that he doesn't make more of them.
Even the 'predictable Hollywood ending' is totally turned on its head and turns the run of the mill ending you think is coming into something hilarious.
****
Superbly written and directed, this is both Shane Black's and Robert Downey Jr.'s comeback film
Film Review: Up In The Air
Up In The Air is the latest film from Jason Reitman (Juno, Thank You For Smoking) and stars George Clooney as Ryan Bingham whose job is simple. Fly from place to place firing people. He loves the lifestyle of living out of his suitcase and never being home but it all goes south when his boss (Jason Bateman) decides to ground him and use video conferencing for the job instead.
Ryan takes exception to this and is made to take the person who thought of the new idea (Anna Kendrick) on one of his cross country trips with him.
A bit of an odd feeling after I left the cinema after this one. Whilst I sat there and enjoyed the film and the performances (especially Clooney who was superb) I left feeling a little empty. I had the same feeling during the (slightly superior) Juno. Just didn't find it something I really wanted to see again.
It wasn't the cast that caused this that's for sure. As previously mentioned Clooney is terrific as is Vera Farmiga as Ryan's 'friend' who meets up with for fun whenever their schedules cross paths.
There's some nice little cameos in there too. The Hangovers Zach Galifianakis is great in an all too brief appearance as someone being 'let go' at the start of the film, and the legendary Sam Elliott always brightens up the worst film.
Was suprised by a quite subtle performance by Danny McBride (Eastbound And Down) as the fiance of Ryan's sister. Very much used to this guy going OTT so it was nice to see him showing he is capable of more (or in this case less).
But even with all that I was left flat by the end of the film, I guess it missed a certain something I can't put my finger on.
***
A fine enough journey to be on, but when you deboard it feels very much like a round trip.
Film Review: (500) Days Of Summer
THE FOLLOWING REVIEW CONTAINS SPOILERS
(500) Days Of Summer is a bit of a change from my usual viewing but I had heard so many good things about it, it would be ignorant to not see it!
(500)... stars Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Zooey Deschanel and is directed by Marc Webb (who will be helming the 2012 Spiderman reboot) and is scripted by Scott Neustadter and Michael H. Weber. Summer, before I go on, refers to the name of Deschanel's character.
It is certainly not your usual rom-com but does contain both of these but really does twist the tried and tired 'Boy meets girl, Boy falls for girl...' formula. Using different devices such as dance routines (a spectacular number to Hall and Oate's 'You Make My Dreams' which will leave a massive smile on your face guaranteed) or split screens for Tom Hansen's (Gordon-Levitt) expectations and reality.
The great thing I found about this was how I felt about the characters after the film. I could not believe how Summer treated Tom at the end. But the more I thought about it...she never actually lied to him about anything. She only wanted some fun, but Tom wanted more. I'm sure some of us have been there one time or another!
But of course that is just my view on it. The note at the start that takes a pop (I assume) at who the film is based on would indicate that Summer is being made the bad guy (gal) of the film. I felt more that Tom just ended up embarrassing himself but I guess it all worked out in the end.
If I had to 'downside' it there was a bit of cringey dialogue in there ("I love how she makes me feel, like anything's possible, or like life is worth it") but that may just be the cynic in me coming out.
****
A great directing debut from Webb, two brilliant performances from the leads and doing something with the genre may not equal 500, but does equal a great film.
Film Review: Youth In Revolt
For a while now, there has been a worry that Michael Cera has been getting typecast as the awkward, bumbling teen after his superb turns in Arrested Development and Superbad. Youth In Revolt gives the gifted actor a chance to spread his wings somewhat.
Directed by Miguel Arteta (The Good Girl) Cera stars as Nick Twisp a lonely child of divorce who is desperate to meet the girl to take his virginity. After a his Mothers boyfriend (Zach Galifianakis in another small but brilliant role) has a run in with some sailors Nick ends up at a trailer park while it all blows over where he meets and falls in love with Sheeni Saunders (Portia Doubleday)
This is where the trailer is a bit misleading. It would have you believe that Nick can't get the girl so thats why he creates his 'alter ego' Francois Dillinger but in fact he can get the girl but needs to live near her so the 'supplementary personality' is created to get Nick in enough trouble he will be sent to live with his Dad (the always great Steve Buscemi)
So starts a hilarious chain of events as Nick and Francois try to get close to Sheeni.
Cera is truely superb in both roles. His usual awkward teen character is perfect for the film and it is an absolute blast to see him as the rebellious Francois especially in a scene where he tries to bed Sheeni ("I want to wrap your legs around my head and wear you like the crown that you are")
The support is also brilliant with some great small roles from Galifianakis, Buscemi, Ray Liotta as a slightly sleazy cop, Justin Long as Sheeni's stoner brother and the legendary Fred Willard as Nicks overenthusiastic neighbour.
Hopefully this will mean a bit more variety in roles for Cera (being seen next in Scott Pilgrim) although an Arrested Development movie is on the cards which would mean going back to the well one more time.
****
Michael Cera has his best role(s) yet in this sweet, funny comedy. Highly recommended.
Film Review: Moon
Out of all the genres of films I have to say that sci-fi - in particular space based sci-fi is my least favorite. I have never been able to pinpoint exactly why - maybe it is suspending disbelief THAT much. I can so Zombies, Werewolves, Vampires but aliens from another planet? Never quite got along with that.
Of course it's unfair to paint the entire genre with the same brush. There are the classics that transcend the tag 'sci-fi' such as Blade Runner, Alien and The Adventures Of Buckaroo Banzai Across The Eighth Dimension (Which I may or may not be joking about.)
And now there is Moon. Directed by Duncan Jones (formerly Zowie Bowie, also a point to note his first feature film!) Moon stars Sam Rockwell as Sam Bell who is nearing the end of a three year stint mining the Moon for a new energy substance that is used as fuel on Earth. As the end nears things begin to get a little strange.
I can't really say anymore about the plot without spoilers cropping up so shall cut right to it. Moon is an amazing film which I throughly enjoyed even with a slightly shaky start (and that was down to me not having a clue what was going on - second viewing I know that feeling will be gone) and Sam Rockwell is truly superb (again I can't say too much about his performance for the sake of spoilers.)
Kevin Spacey also appears - providing the voice of Rockwell's stations computer GERTY. Spacey is perfect for the voice with an air of detachment and I never really knew whether to trust 'him' or not. Inspired vocal casting.
It boggles my mind how films in the same genre such as District 9 and Avatar (especially Avatar with its generic story and over-reliance on visual effects to tell said story) got Best Picture nods at this years Oscars while Moon got... nothing. Not even for Clint Mansell's magnificent score.
I urge you to check it out.
*****
An amazing debut, an amazing performance from Sam Rockwell, an amazing score...AMAZING.